![]() ![]() That said, Ryzen 7000's real-world performance is very good in Geekbench 5, with integer and floating-point scores well ahead of Ryzen 5000's. ![]() But with the introduction of AVX-512 on newer processors - including Intel's 11th Gen Rocket Lake platform, these wide performance deviations between workloads have become much more prominent - making general performance estimations difficult with some synthetic benchmarks. Unfortunately, this has been an ongoing issue with some subtests - we saw this exact issue with the Core i9-11900's Geekbench results. On top of this, Geekbench 5 has been known to weight its average scores to give some subtests more importance than others. The crypto scores, while incredible to see, will only really affect a small fraction of Ryzen 7000 users. In other words, Ryzen 7000's Geekbench 5 performance results could be considered somewhat misleading. Gaming, multitasking, production, and just about everything else uses some form of integer instructions or floating-point calculations. Despite being available for over five years, very few apps currently leverage it - as a result, only a minority of power users and content creators are able to use AVX-512's capabilities.īy contrast, integer and floating-point workloads are the most common workloads you'll see on processors today. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below. The problem with AVX-512 is its adoption rate, which is very low by today's standards. In Geekbench benchmark testing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4/128GB got a 'Single-core' score of 612 points and 'Multi-core' score of 1882. AVX-512 is one of the newer instruction sets seen on modern processors, and it can have a remarkable performance uplift in apps that support it. This unexpected leap in performance can be attributed to Ryzen 7000 adding the AVX-512 instruction set, which Ryzen 5000 lacks. While the floating point and integer results are impressive on their own, Ryzen 7000's biggest performance gains come from the chip's substantially higher Cryptograph benchmark results - which are almost 71% higher than the 5950X's results in single-core performance. Workload differences in Geekbench 5 - 5950X vs 7950X Workloads - Single Threaded ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |